Take 5 minutes to see the difference
Free trial. No card.
Case Study: $72,000 in Penalties for Training That Happened
A manufacturing company's safety manager had conducted most of the required training. Respiratory protection, hazard communication, lockout/tagout procedures—the sessions happened. But when OSHA showed up for a surprise inspection, the inspector found three employees with expired respiratory protection training, no documentation for hazard communication refreshers, and missing records for lockout/tagout procedures completed two years prior.
The violations weren't intentional. With rotating shifts and high turnover, manual tracking simply couldn't keep pace.
The result: $72,000 in penalties, a mandated follow-up inspection, and weeks of productivity lost reconstructing training records.
The hardest part? The safety manager had conducted most of the training. She just couldn't prove it.
When It Goes to Court, the Numbers Get Worse
Regulatory fines are just the starting point. When training documentation failures contribute to actual injuries, the liability exposure escalates dramatically.
Consider James Talbot, a 24-year-old barge worker in Chicago who lost his leg when it was crushed between two barges in 2004. His attorney successfully argued that Talbot was insufficiently trained for the work he was assigned—and critically, the employer couldn't produce documentation proving otherwise. The settlement: $4.5 million.
This isn't an outlier. According to industry analysis, negligent training and supervision claims result in plaintiff victories 79% of the time, with an average settlement of $1.6 million. U.S. companies collectively pay $1 billion per week for disabling workplace injuries—and training records are the first thing plaintiff attorneys subpoena.
The Versioning Connection
This is where the SCORM versioning problem compounds the documentation problem. When you overwrite your training course to reflect updated regulations, you don't just lose the visual record of what the previous version contained—you potentially lose your audit trail for everyone who completed that version. If your LMS tracks completion against a course that no longer exists in its original form, reconstructing what employees actually learned becomes nearly impossible.
The question isn't whether you trained them. It's whether you can prove what you trained them on, when, and that the content matched the regulations in effect at that time.
The Practical Setup
A naming convention makes this seamless:
Keep one lesson named [MASTER] Employee Handbook (or whatever the topic). Assign the lesson to Employees.
When content changes, copy it first. Name the copy with a version identifier—something like "v2025.06 - June Update"—and move it into a history folder. Then update the Master. When you are ready then assign the new version to Employees.
Your Employees' links never change. Employees always get current content. And your compliance folder maintains the complete audit trail.
Why This Matters
Version control isn't a feature checkbox. It's your legal shield.
The difference between "we trained them" and "here's exactly what we trained them on, with completion records attached" is the difference between defensible compliance and exposure.
Traditional SCORM systems were designed when courses were burned to CDs. The architecture assumes static content. But compliance training isn't static—regulations change, policies evolve, and your records need to evolve with them without losing history.
That's the version control problem nobody talks about. Until the audit.
In summary: A SCORM LMS controls versions by treating them as disposable files. REACHUM treats them as living documents inside a folder, which is why it's more efficient for HR teams that need to update compliance materials and keep an audit trail of changes.